UMF's Native American Film and Performance Symposium came to a close last Wednesday with a poetry reading and talk by William Yellow Robe Jr., followed by a staged reading of his play Wood Bones and a Q&A. Yellow Robe is about to publish an e-book tentatively titled Spam Rants of that Crazy Indin Yellow Robe.
While Yellow Robe's poetry concerned itself mainly with the loss of his first wife to cancer, the mere act of writing poetry (as well as being an accomplished playwright) signals his concern over indigenous peoples' ownership of emotions and storytelling. He gives his audiences a unique Native perspective and even when we're angry, disturbed, or saddened by what we hear and see on stage, we (especially non-Native people) need to pay attention. As Yellow Robe tells it, he might be angry and write about it, but if we have no problem asking a crying person why they're sad, then we need to ask angry people why they're angry. And Yellow Robe is angry, at least in print. He's not ranty, or spewing vitriolic negativisms as White people, but he is contesting both White and Native stereotypes and ethnocentrisms and as he said at dinner, it gets tiring to feel like he's saying the same thing over and over and wondering if anything is changing.
One of Yellow Robe's talking points surrounded the commercialization of Native figures as team mascots. I happen to agree with Yellow Robe, but more importantly he illustrates the diversity of opinions amongst Native peoples. James Francis, historian of the Penobscot Nation, speaking last year at Colby College, said that the official stance of the nation is 'they don't really care.' What matters here is that because indigenous peoples are not mascots or costume, but cultures, they are made up of people of differing opinions. In a step towards decolonizing our minds, there must be an acknowledgement that indigenous cultures are not homogenous. In other words, not all Native peoples want the same things! Some care deeply about eliminating discriminatory team mascots while others are concerned about the trampling of environmental or land rights and, frankly, don't give shit about mascots (to paraphrase Francis).
Yellow Robe is what we might call "pro-contamination." As puts it, Native peoples have been contaminated by everyone: "We're even kosher!" His writing is infused with his perspective as an Afro-Native writers and with the idea that authenticity can be found in actions, not in federal papers or the way one dresses. Purity is a moot point in this case. In owning his emotions and writing about them, he validates himself and his identity. But he doesn't think his identity (or the identity of Native Americans generally) should be a point of novelty. As he tells it, numerous people have come up to him and touched his hair and his necklace and other wares. Another component of decolonizing our minds will be a rejection of exterior features as points of fascination, as something to marvel at and, by extension, eulogize. William Yellow Robe Jr. is not wearing his necklace or telling his stories to pay tribute to the past; like most indigenous writers, he's writing to say 'we're still here!'
My philosophy fuses interdisciplinary inquiry with critical thinking, multiculturalism, and a collaborative mindset with the ultimate goal of moving toward what Cornel West calls “intellectual vertigo.” In this state, everyone is a student moving toward the process of becoming more fully human through the act of learning, un-learning, and re-learning.
Showing posts with label Native American literature. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Native American literature. Show all posts
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
Thursday, September 15, 2011
Alexie & Friends
Again, it's been too long. I keep promising to recommit myself, but the rhythm of the semester hasn't come together yet. Everything still feels choppy, though this is only our first full week. Myles and I are still working out the infamous balancing act of time together/time apart/time for work/time for fun. I never feel like I'm winning the battle, especially with the work overload, but we'll see.
I won't make excuses for not posting, but I can say, when it's hot and summer-like, I have no inspiration. I loathe the heat and humidity and lately my room feels something akin to a sweat lodge. When the sun is out, I just want to bask in it and revel in the fleeting vestiges of summer, usually with a glass of chardonnay and some crab meat and crackers. Autumn and winter give me time to contemplate, cooped-up in my haven, watching the snow fall on bare maples.
It always disappoints me when I can't seem to get through my fun reading book. Indeed, I haven't even chosen an author to become enamored with; last year it was Bukowski; the year before, Vonnegut, etc. I think a trip to the library is in order. I'm shying away from the Beats only because it's so trendy right now and I don't want to be mistaken for a hipster. But, I'm thinking Sontag or maybe Paglia. I've read some of their stuff but I need more!
* * *
So, part of this blog is going to be devoted to textual analysis and reflection. I'm taking a class with Michael Johnson (whom I secretly call Mikey J, a trend that seems to be catching on for all those enamored with his soft tone and wonderful bits of insight): Multicultural Literature and Film. In addition to the course, we've added a second component that acts as an independent study. This week: Sherman Alexie's The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in Heaven.
Alexie creates tragic characters, trapped by their own histories and tells us firmly: rez life, Indian life is cyclical. Alcoholism, escape from the rez, the fleeting moments of basketball heroism never change. The world of Thomas Builds-a-Fire and Victor Joseph is awkwardly post-assimilationist: the Indians are already infected with alcoholism, live in HUD homes, are intermittently employed, sometimes for the BIA. Simultaneously, these Spokane Indians are rebels: Victor's father protested the Vietnam war, heard Jimi Hendrix play "The Star-Spangled Banner" (at once patriotically American and dissident), and Thomas Builds-a-Fire criticizes the Tribal Council and gets convicted by the local BIA for his story-telling.
The point of view shifts throughout book too, but we're never quite there, wherever we are. Readers becomes Indians at a distance: witnesses to "crimes of an epic scale." The perspective torments us as we struggle to unravel the hyperbole from realism and slowly discover that we can't. History, wedded to tales of modern rez life, leaves characters indifferent to atrocity and agony, unable to move out their indigence. To change would make these Spokane Indians participants and protagonists in their own drama. But, if "to do is to be" (Sartre), then Victor and Thomas and Julian and all the other characters can't do, because then they might be, be real people, be Americans, be Indians, be defined and confined by identity. Alexie's stories grimly inform us: Native Americans must be stuck in the in-between.
I won't make excuses for not posting, but I can say, when it's hot and summer-like, I have no inspiration. I loathe the heat and humidity and lately my room feels something akin to a sweat lodge. When the sun is out, I just want to bask in it and revel in the fleeting vestiges of summer, usually with a glass of chardonnay and some crab meat and crackers. Autumn and winter give me time to contemplate, cooped-up in my haven, watching the snow fall on bare maples.
It always disappoints me when I can't seem to get through my fun reading book. Indeed, I haven't even chosen an author to become enamored with; last year it was Bukowski; the year before, Vonnegut, etc. I think a trip to the library is in order. I'm shying away from the Beats only because it's so trendy right now and I don't want to be mistaken for a hipster. But, I'm thinking Sontag or maybe Paglia. I've read some of their stuff but I need more!
* * *
So, part of this blog is going to be devoted to textual analysis and reflection. I'm taking a class with Michael Johnson (whom I secretly call Mikey J, a trend that seems to be catching on for all those enamored with his soft tone and wonderful bits of insight): Multicultural Literature and Film. In addition to the course, we've added a second component that acts as an independent study. This week: Sherman Alexie's The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in Heaven.
Alexie creates tragic characters, trapped by their own histories and tells us firmly: rez life, Indian life is cyclical. Alcoholism, escape from the rez, the fleeting moments of basketball heroism never change. The world of Thomas Builds-a-Fire and Victor Joseph is awkwardly post-assimilationist: the Indians are already infected with alcoholism, live in HUD homes, are intermittently employed, sometimes for the BIA. Simultaneously, these Spokane Indians are rebels: Victor's father protested the Vietnam war, heard Jimi Hendrix play "The Star-Spangled Banner" (at once patriotically American and dissident), and Thomas Builds-a-Fire criticizes the Tribal Council and gets convicted by the local BIA for his story-telling.
The point of view shifts throughout book too, but we're never quite there, wherever we are. Readers becomes Indians at a distance: witnesses to "crimes of an epic scale." The perspective torments us as we struggle to unravel the hyperbole from realism and slowly discover that we can't. History, wedded to tales of modern rez life, leaves characters indifferent to atrocity and agony, unable to move out their indigence. To change would make these Spokane Indians participants and protagonists in their own drama. But, if "to do is to be" (Sartre), then Victor and Thomas and Julian and all the other characters can't do, because then they might be, be real people, be Americans, be Indians, be defined and confined by identity. Alexie's stories grimly inform us: Native Americans must be stuck in the in-between.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
